Election Coverage / Politics

Election Integrity Is Winning

election

Election integrity efforts across America are winning, triumphing over the many left-wing attempts to stop them. From judges to the American people themselves, America as a whole is rightfully embracing election integrity measures and rejecting the notions against them.

In Arizona, election integrity recently won a critical challenge against the Democrats. In Brnovich v. DNC., the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the right of the states to alter their own election laws for the purposes of fortifying elections and making it easier to vote but harder to cheat. Specifically, the July ruling upheld Arizona’s 2016 ban on ballot harvesting and their outlawing of out-of-precinct voting.

Although the ruling applied to rules from 2016, the landmark ruling establishes a precedent and sends a powerful message to the Democrats and other enemies of election integrity efforts. The majority opinion in the case was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote, “Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act provides vital protection against discriminatory voting rules, and no one suggests that discrimination in voting has been extirpated, or that the threat has been eliminated. But Section 2 does not deprive the States of their authority to establish non-discriminatory voting rules, and that is precisely what the dissent’s radical interpretation would mean in practice.”

Alito continued by declaring, “In light of the principles set out above, neither Arizona’s out-of-precinct rule nor its ballot collection law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Arizona’s out-of-precinct rule enforces the requirement that voters who choose to vote in-person on election day must do so in their assigned precincts. Having to identify one’s own polling place and then travel there to vote does not exceed ‘the usual burdens of voting.’ On the contrary, these tasks are quintessential examples of the usual burdens of voting.”

Bans on ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting are not the only election integrity measures that Arizona has enacted. After the November 2020 election, Arizona’s Republican Governor Doug Ducey signed S.B. 1485 into law on May 11, 2021. The law further secures Arizona’s elections by automatically removing inactive voters who do not vote in two consecutive primary and general elections from the voter rolls. With at least nine other states enacting similar election integrity laws since the November 2020 election, Arizona is not alone on its mission to secure their elections.

Arizona is one of two states that is currently auditing a significant amount of their state’s ballots from the November 2020 election. On March 31, 2021, the Arizona Senate announced a full forensic audit of every ballot from Maricopa County in the November 2020 election, as well as a forensic audit of Maricopa County’s election equipment. According to recent testimony from Arizona audit leader Doug Logan, approximately 18,000 voters in Maricopa County’s November 2020 election “voted in the election and then showed as been removed from the voter rolls soon after the election.” More disturbingly, Logan claims that “We have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent.”

Lastly, Arizona Audit liaison Ken Bennett recently testified that “We found, I would have to say, thousands of duplicate ballots where those serial numbers are not on them. And so, it has created great difficulty to try to match up a duplicated ballot to its duplicate. And on thousands of the ones that a serial number was put on, they were put on by a, I guess you would call it, a dot matrix printer, very, very light.” For comparison, Biden’s reported margin of victory in Arizona’s 2020 election was just 10,458 votes.

In Georgia, Republican Governor Brian Kemp signed S.B. 202 into law on March 25, 2021. S.B. 202 is a comprehensive election integrity bill that mandates voters who request a mail-in or absentee ballot provide a form of identification, prohibits the mailing of unsolicited ballots to voters, expands early voting in rural areas, creates new security standards for ballot drop boxes, requires all Georgia counties to report the total number of ballots they have received by 10:00 p.m. on Election Night, and demands that every Georgia county certify their election results within six days of Election Day. Kemp and Georgia Republicans were met with rage from Democrats and left-wing activists across America for enacting S.B. 202, with Democrats going as far as challenging the new rules in court.

However, leftist claims against the common-sense election integrity measures once again fell upon deaf ears in court. On July 7, 2021, U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee refused to block aspects of S.B. 202 that were being challenged by the Coalition for Good Governance, a radical left-wing group that sued Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in Coalition for Good Governance v. Raffensperger. To quote Judge Boulee, “The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument for a bright line exception to Purcell because they have alleged First Amendment harm. Plaintiffs have not provided authority, nor is the court aware of any, that would support this interpretation of the law.”

Like Arizona, Georgia is also actively auditing many of their state’s ballots from the November 2020 election. Due to a recent lawsuit filed by VoterGA in Fulton County, Georgia, all of Fulton County’s approximately 147,000 absentee ballots from the November 2020 election have been unsealed and are currently under review. According to VoterGA, a previous hand-count audit of ballots from Fulton County’s November 2020 election “Was riddled with massive errors and provable fraud.” As evidence, VoterGA provides the newly analyzed ballot images from Fulton County’s November 2020 election, which were made public after a ruling from Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero.

According to the analysis, “The error reporting rate in Fulton’s hand-count audit is a whopping 60%.” The analysis also uses the mail-in ballot images to claim that “4,255 total extra votes were redundantly added to Fulton November audit results. This includes 3,390 extra votes for Joe Biden, 865 extra votes for Donald Trump and 43 extra votes for Jo Jorgenson.” Finally, the analysis states that “The VoterGA team found 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals for their respective batches.” In contrast, Biden’s reported margin of victory in Georgia’s November 2020 election was just 11,779 votes. Given that these are results from just one county, it is probable that the total number of impacted ballots in Georgia is greater than Biden’s reported margin of victory.

As a result of these disturbing revelations, Fulton County Board of Commissioners Chairman Robb Pitts recently called for more full forensic audits into the November 2020 election results reported by various Georgia counties. To quote Pitts: “It is also my understanding that other counties had issues in their elections and finding ballots not included in the initial tabulation. If you are requesting that Fulton County be the subject of such an investigation, then I believe it would only be fair that all counties with issues be subject to investigation.” Pitts is not alone. On May 26, 2021, an array of 531 prominent Republicans sent a letter to Governor Kemp urging him to utilize his authority and convene a Special Session to launch a full forensic audit into Georgia’s November 2020 election results.

Election integrity is not just winning in the courts; it is also winning among the American people. American voters overwhelmingly support common-sense election integrity rules. According to a recent survey, 89 percent of registered voters support removing dead voters from the voter rolls, 87 percent oppose ballot harvesting, 78 percent support stronger voter ID laws and signature verification requirements, 71 percent do not believe that any ballots should be accepted after polls close on Election Day, and 66 percent believe that ballots cast early should be counted as they are received.

Despite what Democrats deceptively claim, they are not in support of election integrity. Instead, they want to unconstitutionally attain absolute control over the entire election process, federalizing elections and essentially rigging them in favor of the Democrats. Conservatives are the only group actively fighting for sensible and popular election integrity laws, and as of now, they are winning.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

As we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we're asking you to consider a gift to help fund our journalism and advocacy.

The need for fact-based reporting that offers real solutions and stops the spread of misinformation has never been greater. Now more than ever, journalism and our first amendment rights are under fire. That's why AMAC is passionately working to increase the number of real news articles we deliver WEEKLY, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill.

AMAC Action, a 501 (C)(4), advocates to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, the rule of law, and love of family.

Thank you for putting your faith in AMAC!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by AMAC, Parker Bono
Subscribe
Notify of
98 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wayne
57 minutes ago

“According to a recent survey, 89 percent of registered voters support removing dead voters from the voter rolls,”

Just 89 percent?

Robert Zuccaro
5 hours ago

Biden’s State of Delaware doesn’t even have early voting… how “Jim Crow” is that? They called Trump “Hitler” for 4 years + an “illegitimate President” so my opinion is “if CNN says it didn’t happen, it did”. I have no proof, just an opinion that if if they actually believe Trump is “Hitler”, you would do anything to stop Hitler from being elected, you would! Even fix an election. The deep government spies on citizens and gets away with that… why NOT fix an election? It’s not like it is a first!

Sammy
6 hours ago

What a disgrace our election was last November. Now look where we are. No wonder people want election integrity. What happened last November can never happen again no matter which side of the aisle you stand in.

Reality
7 hours ago

affiliation

Reality
7 hours ago

Even in the suburbs, Republicans/conservatives need to be poll officials there. Sign up at your city hall. You don’t need to give your political offiliation. They need poll workers. Speak up about any irregularities you see. Write them done. Text or email your representative/s about what you saw. Read the polling material to know what is allowed and what isn’t. We have only ourselves to blame if cheating happens. Know the rules and follow them and don’t let any officials say you can or can’t do something if that is not stated in the materials.

Reality
7 hours ago

The Democrat slime cheats every way possible. The cheating was so blatant and obvious. Republicans/conservatives need to have election officials at all polling places, If there are only democrats at the polling places, the cheating will continue. I have been a poll official in the inner city. White males need to be poll officials there. They are not going to kill you. You can talk sports, etc.

Hal
8 hours ago

If you don’t feel that at least it is very extremely highly likely that the last POTUS election outcome produced results that did NOT reflect the will of the Majority of legal voters in this Nation, you are either naive or a typical DemocRat or a DemocRat that thinks cheating is justified because he/she believes the DemocRat Party is his/her religion.

Hal
8 hours ago

Over the modern history of voting in the US (Late 19th century and on) the DemocRat Party has favored lax voting rules/regulations (IMO because it is easier for them to cheat and control the results to come out favorable to the DemocRat Party). And the DemocRat Party has pretty much controlled the media to their advantage in modern history of voting with a few exceptions. IF YOU DON’T HAVE A FAIR AND HONEST VOTING SYSTEM … you don’t have representative results of what the majority wants in its choices (and that is the beauty of Constitutional governance over all the other political systems such as Socialism, Anarchy, Ruling Family Dynasties, Communism, Socialism, etc.). Remember, historically the DemocRat Party in the US wants to RULE the Nation, while the Republican Party generally tends to be committed to GOVERNING ACCORDING TO CONSTITUTIONAL governance).

Rik
9 hours ago

Election integrity??? … You want an 0example of Election Integrity? … Just watch the upcoming Recall Election of Governor “Hair Gel” Newsom here in CaliMexico September 14th! … it’s “mail-in” only! … What’s that tell you? Hundreds of thousands of people have already left CaliMexico and each and every one of them would have voted against him! And the only people moving in are “illegal” immigrants. I would venture to now estimate that we now have at least 13 million illegals here alone. What’s that? At least 40% of CaliMexico prefers to speak Spanish! … and of course, CAN’T VOTE! … At least Not legally! So any bets on whether Governor Newsom survives? … We’ll see but don’t bet against Newsom losing just yet!

PaulE
8 hours ago
Reply to  Rik

Are you honestly surprised Rik? This is how they play the game. You had to know that the Democrats would “adjust” the rules in some way to allow Newsom to survive a recall vote. After all, Democrats will be counting the votes, so do you really think they are going to allow “the people” to weaken their grip of complete control on your state? Look at how they barred Larry Elder from even being on the ballot. Now they’ll just run his lawyers around in court for a few months, until it is too late for him to ever get his name on the ballot. The Democrats in your state are just giving the people the middle finger and laughing as they do it.

The ONLY way either the 2022 or 2024 elections will be anything approaching valid is if EVERY SINGLE STATE IN THE COUNTRY, not just a handful like we have now, doing away with every voting procedure change enacted in 2020. In short, back to pre-2020 voter rules period and strengthening voter ID rules. Anything other than that and most Americans on our side of the aisle will be shocked by the outcome.

Rik
5 hours ago
Reply to  PaulE

Hi PaulE, I agree with you 100% but Larry Elder WILL BE on the ballot but I fear it’s the 100’s of thousands of people who were forced to leave this state who ALL would have voted against Newsom.

PaulE
3 hours ago
Reply to  Rik

I agree that the people fleeing California would be the most likely to vote to replace Newsom and many have already left. The odds of California or for that matter any of the reliably blue states waking up and voting to try Republican governance down the whole ballot is slim at best at this point.

Just as an FYI, the Biden administration has called off the DOJ investigation of NY’s Governor Cuomo for the 16,000 deaths he caused in nursing homes last year. Democrats take care of their own, so none ever face the consequences of their actions. Meanwhile, the Never Trumpers are already gearing up to split the Republican vote for 2022 and 2024. So get used to the sh*t show, because the Republican establishment seems determined to aid the Democrats by running a series of RINOs in 2022 and 2024.

Last edited 3 hours ago by PaulE
Karen
10 hours ago

Something positive for a change. Good Luck, you”all.

Splish_Splash
11 hours ago

The idea that ELECTION INTEGRITY is even an issue that needs to be discussed is shocking. I guess it shows where our culture really is. DEAR AMERICANS: WHY WOULD YOU EVEN QUESTION THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR INTEGRITY IN ELECTIONS OR FOR THAT MATTER IN ANY AREA OF LIFE! If you poo oo this idea, that is a clue as to how much in trouble you are as a human being let alone the culture you live in!

Pete from St Pete
1 day ago

What disturbs me is that the 3 court members appointed by Obama all were steadfast in voting against the majority. It shows just how woke they have become in direct contravention to the oath they took to uphold the Constitution when they were sworn in.

Splish_Splash
11 hours ago

That is exactly why Bath house Barry nominated them!

Bonnie
1 day ago

finally great news reporting. love it

John
1 day ago

I think you will enjoy this information for support of what you believe.

Van
1 day ago

My worry would be that if these states, that have problems, fix their problems, then the Democrats will just move these actions to other states that haven’t worked the issues. All states should make the appropriate changes that contribute to the additional false voting. Or we will have the same outcome in 2024.

Van
1 day ago
Reply to  Van

Appropriate changes that FIX the problems that contribute to the false voting.

Sorry, the above was not clear.

Gary
2 days ago

If a person moves out of State , that that person disassociates him/her self from that State . And, no longer has the right to give or alter the future direction of the State. Simple as that . Movement out of any jurisdiction or District within a State also disassociates that person from voting in their former jurisdiction or District . Also, if you move out of an incorporated village or town or city , you likewise have NO right to give or alter the future direction of your former municipality . So, why is this an issue ?

Hal
8 hours ago
Reply to  Gary

Obviously, the DemocRats want to protect and defend the their partisan right to cheat in elections!!!

JohnH
2 days ago

Taking dead voters off voter rolls & asking a person for identification to vote is a no-brainer to me. Why does any state allow dead voters if they know that person is deceased.

Gary
2 days ago
Reply to  JohnH

Michigan not only allows dead people to remain on the rolls but Michigan also permits them to continually ask for absentee ballots every year and to continually vote in elections , especially in Wayne County , a DEMOCRAT stronghold . Perhaps , if the State Department that runs elections were led by both a Democrat AND a Republican , then they could keep an eye on each other . When only one party runs the elections , guess what happens , they cheat . Remember , when the cat’s away , the mice will play .

Garye
10 hours ago
Reply to  Gary

Great thoughts Gary.
We also need to rid Michigans state government of ANY/ALL elected people whichever party who continue to IGNORE the will of their bosses , the Citizens!
Who do these self serving politicians think they are???
Everyone needs to call them out,expose their positions,make EVERY vote easily viewed and THROW OUT THE LIARS AND ENTITLED.
On numerous issues I have emailed the current failures in Michigan, either you receive no response or a standard canned response which NEVER addresses the question.
They hate accountability for their views ,votes and positions.
They are dishonest and think themselves smarter and above mere Citizens.
NOT ONE is worthy of representing Our State of Michigan.

Frannie Page
2 days ago

we need to fight fraud in voting…c’mon Americans…we can do this!!!!!

Jesse Tiede
2 days ago

So what does this “Election Integrity” mean? The Democrats are firmly ensconced in the positions needed to control all elections going forward! With the now proven techniques leading to discrepancies in the voting records, coupled with the resistance in something so simple as requiring a picture ID to vote, it’s debatable that this country will ever see another fair election. God help the USA…

Philip Hammersley
2 days ago
Reply to  Jesse Tiede

A lot of the fraud occurred in DIMM cities in GOP states. The GOP leaders need to send State Troopers to watch the voting and to make sure the poll watchers are allowed to WATCH!

Gary
2 days ago
Reply to  Jesse Tiede

In order to help achieve election integrity , we must fire half of the Democrat staffed and monopolized elections bureaus and replace the fired half with Republicans. This provides balance and a check on each party . This will provide partisan balance.

Linda Johnson
2 days ago

There must be common sense rules of integrity for voting….. We show an ID for many other situations, why should showing anID to vote be any different unless you want to cheat. Why keep names of deceased individuals on the roster unless again, you want to cheat. This is why democrats cheat and lie so easily. They are a bunch of thieves…..

Jesse Tiede
2 days ago
Reply to  Linda Johnson

Well, most of them ARE career politicians, after all…

98
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x